{"id":11213,"date":"2026-02-16T11:53:00","date_gmt":"2026-02-16T18:53:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/?p=11213"},"modified":"2026-02-16T11:54:05","modified_gmt":"2026-02-16T18:54:05","slug":"on-the-seriousness-of-sin-and-much-more","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/?p=11213","title":{"rendered":"On the seriousness of sin and \u201cmuch more\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p style=\"text-align:center\"><a href= \"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Lent-A1-Romans-512.pdf\">Select here for a pdf version.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Matthew 4:1-11; Romans 5:12-19<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A Sermon for the First Sunday in Lent<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What is the problem? That\u2019s what the texts for today are asking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Paul Tillich said that Luther\u2019s question: \u201cHow can I find a gracious God?\u201d may have been true in Luther\u2019s time, but that\u2019s no longer true today. Rather the question today is: Is there a God at all? Does God exist?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There have been a number of public intellectuals, atheists, who have taken up the question: Does God exist? And they have answered: No. Most well-known are those called the New Atheists (Harris, Dawkins, Dennett, and others). Each of them in their own way makes what\u2019s called a category error. They judge religion by the rules of a certain kind of logic and science. It\u2019s like judging the Mona Lisa by analyzing the chemistry of the paint Leonardo Da Vinci used. That\u2019s a category error.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another public intellectual, the English philosopher Roger Scruton (1944-2020), criticized the New Atheists. He said they think they can dissolve the sacred into biology. They don\u2019t understand that religion deals with the meaning of life, and the meaning of life is not reducible to science. That\u2019s a category error.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another problem is that when you come down to it, everybody may not \u201cbelieve in God,\u201d but everybody has a God, even atheists. Whatever is final for you is your \u201cGod.\u201d Whatever is decisive. If you say, God must be reasonable to us, then whatever \u201creason\u201d means to you is your \u201cGod.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Psalm 14:1 (also Psalm 53:1) says: \u201cThe fool has said in his heart: \u2018There is no God.\u2019\u201d By which the psalmist doesn\u2019t mean that one, the fool, is stupid, but rather: To say there is no God is foolishness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What then do we do about all this?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The problem is original sin. What is the origin of it? What is the basis for and continues to be what sin is about?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cIn Adam\u2019s fall, we sinned all.\u201d That\u2019s a famous line from the New England Primer, 1690. What is it about? There is a lot of misunderstanding. People think it has to do with sexuality or some mechanical transmission of sin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That happens when people misuse Psalm 51:5: \u201cI was born in sin and in sin did my mother conceive me.\u201d &nbsp;And Romans 5:12: \u201cAs sin came into the world through one man and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all men sinned.\u201d &nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Augustine famously misunderstood this verse and interpreted it to mean that original sin is inherited from birth. But you will have noticed it means \u201cbecause all sinned.\u201d Not that there was some kind of biological taint that was passed on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What was original sin about? It wasn\u2019t defined by the Western church until 529 A.D. at the Second Council of Orange. Then it was forgotten for 500 years because it was so obvious that we\u2019re all on a slippery slope. We\u2019re not able not to sin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What does this mean? What if we compare original sin to a wrecked car. As we all know, a wrecked car can mean more than one thing. It can mean a fender bender, that can be fixed by getting a new fender or a new grill. Or it can mean that the car was totaled and the whole thing is junk.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The analogy breaks down because even when a car is totaled, some parts might be salvageable. They could be taken out of the wreck and reused.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Something else is going on with original sin, and again we can go back to Augustine. He is famous for saying: \u201cMy heart is restless \u2018til it rests in thee.\u201d He was saying that we have within us a bent for God.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But Luther and his fellow Reformers said (in effect): \u201cNo, that\u2019s not right. We don\u2019t have a bent for God. To the contrary, we would rather be gods ourselves. We are rebels. We want to run our lives and run the universe. And please don\u2019t bother me.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What the Lord does is snatch us even as we rebel and fight against him. We are unable not to sin. We want to be gods ourselves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We come then to the text in Matthw in which Jesus and Satan are in this debate. Shakespeare picks this up in <em>The Merchant of Venice<\/em>, Act I: \u201cEven the devil quotes Scripture to his ends.\u201d After all, the question is not who can quote Scripture, because even the devil can, but the real question is: What is the proper use of Scripture? Or put another way: What is the problem as well as the solution?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We go back to Genesis 2 and 3. Recall that Adam and Eve were not to eat of that tree of good and evil that was in the middle of the garden. The devil lies to them and says: \u201cDon\u2019t worry. You will not die.\u201d Of course that means you will not die right away.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What is it that they tempted by? They are tempted by knowing the difference between good and evil and being wise like God.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That\u2019s the beginning, the origin, and the meaning of what sin is about. It\u2019s put even more directly by Paul in 1 Cor 4:3-4: \u201cBut for me it is a very small thing that I should be judged by you or by any human court. I do not even judge myself. I am not aware of anything against myself, but I am not thereby acquitted. It is the Lord who judges me.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In other words, in both Genesis 3 and 1 Corinthians 4, the great temptation is to think that we know what sin is, and that we can discern it, and that we can handle it. That\u2019s the great temptation. But we can\u2019t. As Luther said in his famous discussion of good works: \u201cAll the commandments are really the First Commandment: Thou shall not have other gods before me.\u201d But we don\u2019t like it. We want to run things ourselves. That\u2019s called spiritual pride.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The real problem with Adam and Eve was: \u201cDon\u2019t eat of that tree, obey. That\u2019s it.\u201d And they answered: \u201cWell, no. I want to know what and why, and I want to be able to decide the rest.\u201d That\u2019s what is so profound about that material.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a similar way in 2 Cor 11:14, Paul writes: \u201cEven Satan appears as an angel of light.\u201d What people think is: \u201cThat applies to others, but not to me. I know if something is an angel of light or an angel of darkness.\u201d But we don\u2019t. That\u2019s the problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That\u2019s why in Romans 5, we have this remarkable second part of the text: 5:18: \u201cAs one man\u2019s trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one man\u2019s act of righteousness leads to acquittal and life for all men.\u201d That is where we have the first Adam and the second Adam. And that\u2019s where we can know what good and evil is, and what it is to be wise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But note those two key words \u2013 \u201cmuch more\u201d \u2013 Paul uses that 4 times here (!) \u2013 in what Jesus Christ has done. It\u2019s the cross that tells us how serious sin is. Apart from the cross we have no sense of no sense of how serious sin is.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The cross tells us how serious it is and then it tells us \u201cmuch more\u201d: It tells us he\u2019s taken care of it. That\u2019s what we look forward to as we look forward to Good Friday and Easter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Amen<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Matthew 4:1-11; Romans 5:12-19<\/p>\n<p>A Sermon for the First Sunday in Lent<\/p>\n<p>What is the problem? That\u2019s what the texts for today are asking.<\/p>\n<p>Paul Tillich said that Luther\u2019s question: \u201cHow can I find a gracious God?\u201d may have been true in Luther\u2019s time, but that\u2019s no longer true today. Rather the question today is: Is there a God at all? Does God exist?<\/p>\n<p>There have been a number of public intellectuals, atheists, who have taken up the question: Does God exist? And they have answered: No. Most well-known are those called the New Atheists (Harris, Dawkins, Dennett, and others). Each of them in their own way makes what\u2019s called a category error. They judge religion by the rules of a certain kind of logic and science. It\u2019s like judging the Mona Lisa by analyzing the chemistry of the paint Leonardo Da Vinci used. That\u2019s a category error.<\/p>\n<p>Select <a href=\"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/?p=11213\"> here<\/a> to read more or <a href= \"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/Lent-A1-Romans-512.pdf\">here <\/a> for a pdf version.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11213"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11213\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11219,"href":"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11213\/revisions\/11219"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crossalone.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}